62000 PRIMERA DRIVER DOWNLOAD

62000 PRIMERA DRIVER DOWNLOAD

July 9, 2020

Help Print this page. Unlike Article a of the EC Treaty now, after amendment, Article 95 EC , which was inserted into the Treaty after the adoption of the Directive and allows for certain derogations, that legal basis provides no possibility for the Member States to maintain or establish provisions departing from Community harmonising measures. Article EC is worded in the form of an instruction addressed to the Community concerning its future policy and cannot permit the Member States, owing to the direct risk that would pose for the acquis communautaire, autonomously to adopt measures contrary to the Community law contained in the directives already adopted at the time of entry into force of that law. In fact, the competence conferred in that respect on the Member States by Article 5 EC concerns only the measures mentioned at paragraph 3 b of that article, that is to say measures supporting, supplementing and monitoring the policy pursued by the Member States. Article 13 thereof should be interpreted as meaning that the Directive does not alter the provisions of national law relating to contractual or non-contractual liability or even relating to a special system of liability in force on the date of the Directive’s notification to the Member States, which provisions are often more favourable to the victim of damage. This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. Timmermans, Judges, Advocate General:

Uploader: Faemi
Date Added: 25 March 2005
File Size: 14.83 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 20517
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Primera Composer Pro CD DVD Optical Disc Duplicator 62000

Moreover, it is subject inter alia to conditions as to assessment with a view to further harmonisation, to which the penultimate recital 6200 the preamble expressly refers.

It goes on to state that in so far as these provisions also serve to attain the objective of effective protection of consumers, they should remain unaffected by this Directive and that in so far as effective protection of consumers in the sector of pharmaceutical products is already also attained in a Member State under a special liability system, claims based on this system should similarly remain possible. That competence does not extend to the measures referred to in paragraph 3 a of Article EC, that is to say the measures adopted pursuant to Article 95 EC pdimera the context of attainment of the internal market with which in that respect the measures adopted under Primsra 94 EC must be equated.

The blood used for the priimera had been treated by a transfusion centre. Jann RapporteurPresident of the Chamber, S. The fact that the Directive provides for certain derogations or refers in certain cases to national law does primerz mean that in regard to the matters which it regulates harmonisation is not complete.

  BROTHER PT-1230PC LINUX DRIVER

Need more search options? It would plainly be contrary to the Directive’s objective for its transposition to result in less protection for the victim.

EUR-Lex – CJ – EN – EUR-Lex

Decision on costs Costs 35 The costs incurred by the Spanish, Greek, French and Austrian Governments, and by the Commission, which submitted observations to the Court, are not recoverable. European Court reports Page I The Court may not decline to give a ruling on a question referred to it by a national court unless it is quite obvious that the interpretation of Community law or the consideration of the validity of a Community rule sought by that court bears no relation to the facts of the main action or its purpose.

Approximation of laws – Measures for the establishment and functioning of the internal market – Legal basis – Article of the Treaty now Article 94 EC – Possibility for the Member States to maintain or establish provisions departing from Community harmonisation measures – No such possibility EEC Treaty, Art.

Article 13 thereof should be interpreted as meaning that the Directive does not alter the provisions of national law relating to contractual or non-contractual liability or even relating to a special system of liability in force on the date of the Directive’s notification to the Member States, which provisions are often more favourable to the victim of damage. Skip to main content. Article 13 of the Directive cannot be interpreted as enabling the victim of damage to rely, in regard to the products coming within the Directive’s scope, on a system of liability more favourable than that provided for by it.

Languages and formats available. Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in pdimera action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. Preliminary question 14 By its question the referring court is essentially seeking to ascertain whether Article 13 of the Directive must be interpreted as meaning that the rights conferred under the legislation of a Member State on victims of damage caused by a defective product may primefa limited or restricted as a result of the Directive’s transposition into the domestic law of that State.

Would you like to keep them?

EUR-Lex – TB(01) – EN – EUR-Lex

Unlike Rpimera a of the EC Primmera now, after amendment, Article 95 ECwhich was inserted into the Treaty after the adoption of the Directive and allows for certain derogations, that legal basis provides no possibility for the Member States to maintain or establish provisions departing from Community harmonising measures. Substance Observations submitted to the Court 19 The Spanish Government and the Commission maintain that the purpose of the Directive is to harmonise the legal orders of the Member States in regard to liability for defective products.

  ATI FIREGL V8650 DRIVER

According to the first recital in the preamble thereto, approximation is necessary because legislative divergences may distort competition and affect the movement of goods within the common market and entail a differing degree of protection of the consumer against damage caused by a defective product to his health or property. This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. Article EC is worded in the form of an instruction addressed to the Community concerning its future policy and cannot permit the Member States, owing to the direct risk that would pose for the acquis communautaire, autonomously to adopt measures contrary to the Community law contained in the directives already adopted at the time of entry into force of that law.

Legal framework Community legislation 3 The Directive seeks to approximate the laws of the Member States concerning the liability of producers for damage caused by defective products. Approximation of laws – Measures for the establishment and functioning of the internal market – Legal basis – Article of the Treaty now Article 94 EC – Possibility for the Member States to maintain or primerx provisions departing from Community harmonisation measures – No such possibility.

Loosli-Surrans, and the Commission, represented by B.

Valero Jordana, acting as Agents, at the hearing on 3 May. Expand all Collapse all. Help Print this page.

EU case law Case law Digital reports Directory of case law. Preliminary rulings – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Manifestly irrelevant question primea Jurisdiction of national courts – Establishment and evaluation of the facts – Application of provisions interpreted by the Court.

This Directive shall not affect any rights which an injured person may have according to the rules of the law of contractual or non-contractual liability or a special liability system existing at the moment prmiera this Directive is notified. Judgment of the Court Fifth Chamber of 25 April Vodina, acting as Agents, – the French Government, by R.

Furthermore, as the Advocate General noted at point 43 of his Opinion, Article EC is worded in the form of an instruction addressed to the Community concerning its future policy and cannot primeda the Member States, owing to the direct risk that would pose for the acquis communautaire, autonomously prlmera adopt measures contrary to the Community law contained in the directives already adopted at the time of entry into force of that law.

Posted in Scanners